Reviewers must have some experience performing detailed design reviews and breaking the design under consideration, especially for new platforms or environments. The organization can learn the benefits of design review by seeing real results for a few high-risk, high-profile applications. Perform design review for high-risk applications. Some of these environments might provide robust security feature sets, whereas others might have key capability gaps that require careful consideration, so organizations should not consider the applicability and correct use of security features in just one tier of the application but across all tiers that constitute the architecture and operational environment. Many modern applications are no longer simply вЂњ3-tierвЂќ but instead involve components architected to interact across a variety of tiers: browser/endpoint, embedded, web, microservices, orchestration engines, deployment pipelines, third-party SaaS, and so on. Organizations often carry out security feature review with checklist-driven analysis and procedural threat modeling efforts. In some cases, use of the firmвЂ™s secure-by-design components can streamline this process (see ). For example, this kind of review would identify both a system that was subject to escalation of privilege attacks because of broken access control as well as a mobile application that incorrectly puts PII in local storage. Security-aware reviewers identify the security features in an application and its deployment configuration (authentication, access control, use of cryptography, etc.), then inspect the design and runtime parameters for problems that would cause these features to fail at their purpose or otherwise prove insufficient.

How to install aa2